ICC fears ‘state policy’ to attack Rohingyas

International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has said the ICC judges feared that Myanmar may have ‘state policy’ to attack its minority Rohingya population in Rakhine. “The Judges accepted that there is a reasonable basis to believe that — there may have been a state (Myanmar) policy to attack the Rohingya population,” she said in a statement on Friday. The statement came following the approval of ICC to commence an investigation into crimes committed against Rohingyas.

As per the Judges observation, the prosecutor said “there are many sources indicating the heavy involvement of several Myanmar government forces and other state agents, and that members of the Myanmar armed forces (“Tatmadaw”), jointly with other Myanmar security forces and with some participation of local civilians, may have committed these crimes against humanity.”

“These coercive acts could qualify as the crimes against humanity of deportation and persecution on grounds of ethnicity and/or religion against the Rohingya population,” the prosecutor said referring to what ICC judges accepted to give the authorization.

Saying that the Judges authorised the investigation with broad parameters, Bensouda termed it as a significant development against atrocity in Myanmar.

On Nov 14, the ICC Judges of Pre-Trial Chamber III have authorised the prosecutor office to commence an investigation into the “Situation in Bangladesh/Myanmar”.

Mentioning that Myanmar is not a State Party of the ICC, but Bangladesh is, the prosecutor welcomed the Chamber’s conclusion that the alleged deportation of civilians across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, which involved victims crossing that border, clearly establishes a territorial link on the basis of the “actus reus of this crime”- that is, “the crossing into Bangladesh by the victims.”

“The Court may exercise jurisdiction over crimes when part of the criminal conduct takes place on the territory of a State Party,” she said.

The prosecutor said her investigation will seek to uncover the truth and focus its efforts on ensuring the pursuit and success of its independent and impartial investigation.

She also noted that the Chamber saw no reason to disagree with “my assessment that there are no substantial reasons to believe that an investigation into the situation would not be in the interests of justice.”

 

ICC fears state policy to attack Rohingyas

International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has said the ICC judges feared that Myanmar may have state policy to attack its minority Rohingya population in Rakhine. The Judges accepted that there is a reasonable basis to believe that there may have been a state (Myanmar) policy to attack the Rohingya population, she said in a statement on Friday. The statement came following the approval of ICC to commence an investigation into crimes committed against Rohingyas. As per the Judges observation, the prosecutor said there are many sources indicating the heavy involvement of several Myanmar government forces and other state agents, and that members of the Myanmar armed forces (Tatmadaw), jointly with other Myanmar security forces and with some participation of local civilians, may have committed these crimes against humanity. These coercive acts could qualify as the crimes against humanity of deportation and persecution on grounds of ethnicity and/or religion against the Rohingya population, the prosecutor said referring to what ICC judges accepted to give the authorization. Saying that the Judges authorised the investigation with broad parameters, Bensouda termed it as a significant development against atrocity in Myanmar. On Nov 14, the ICC Judges of Pre-Trial Chamber III have authorised the prosecutor office to commence an investigation into the Situation in Bangladesh/Myanmar. Mentioning that Myanmar is not a State Party of the ICC, but Bangladesh is, the prosecutor welcomed the Chambers conclusion that the alleged deportation of civilians across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, which involved victims crossing that border, clearly establishes a territorial link on the basis of the actus reus of this crime- that is, the crossing into Bangladesh by the victims. The Court may exercise jurisdiction over crimes when part of the criminal conduct takes place on the territory of a State Party, she said. The prosecutor said her investigation will seek to uncover the truth and focus its efforts on ensuring the pursuit and success of its independent and impartial investigation. She also noted that the Chamber saw no reason to disagree with my assessment that there are no substantial reasons to believe that an investigation into the situation would not be in the interests of justice.